Analysis of Digitalization of Regional Tax Administration, Taxpayer Knowledge and Internal Control of Regional Tax Revenue in Batu City with Taxpayer Compliance as a Moderating Variable
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.65150/EP-jefrr/V2E2/2026-02Keywords:
Tax Administration Digitalization, Taxpayer Knowledge, Internal Control, Regional Tax Revenue, Taxpayer ComplianceAbstract
This study aims to determine and analyze the Digitalization of Regional Tax Administration, Taxpayer Knowledge and Internal Control on Regional Tax Revenue in Batu City with Taxpayer Compliance as a Moderating Variable. This research is a quantitative study, the data source used is a primary data source. Data was obtained through filling out a questionnaire. The population in this study was 875 and the research sample was 90 respondents determined by the Non-Probability technique with the quota method. Data analysis was carried out through the SPSS program. The data analysis methods used were: descriptive statistical tests, classical assumption tests, multiple linear regression analysis and hypothesis testing. The results of the study indicate that there is a partial and significant influence of the Digitalization of Regional Tax Administration, Taxpayer Knowledge, Internal Control and Taxpayer Compliance on regional tax revenue in Batu City. Taxpayer compliance does not moderate the influence of digitalization of regional tax administration on regional tax revenue in Batu City. Taxpayer compliance does not moderate the influence of taxpayer knowledge on regional tax revenue in Batu City either. Taxpayer compliance does not moderate the influence of internal control on regional tax revenue in Batu City.
References
1) Alm, J., & Torgler, B. (2011). Do Ethics Matter? Tax Compliance and Morality. Journal of Business Ethics, 101, 635–651. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-011-0761-9
2) Bodnar, G. H., & Hopwood, W. S. (2013). Accounting Information Systems 11th ed. Pearson Education.
3) Braithwaite, V. (2003). Taxing Democracy.
4) Challender, S. (1999). Systems Thinking, Systems Practice. By Peter B. Checkland. Published by John Wiley, Chichester, UK, 1981, 330 pp., ISBN 0 471 27911 0 (republished 1999 in paperback, with a 30-year retrospective). From a practitioner perspective. John Wiley.
5) COSO, C. of S. O. of the T. C. (1992). Internal Control - Integrated Framework.
6) Hermanto, B., & Lisa, O. (2025). Akuntansi Perpajakan: Kemudahan Berusaha Bidang Perpajakan Membangun Sistem Perpajakah yang Adil, Sehat, Efektif, dan Akuntanbel. Jombang: Penerbit Lima Aksara.
7) Hesami, S., Jenkins, H., & Jenkins, G. (2024). Digital Transformation of Tax Administration and Compliance: A Systematic Literature Review on E-Invoicing and Prefilled Returns. Digital Government: Research and Practice. https://doi.org/10.1145/3643687
8) Indo, B. (2021). Sektor Pariwisata Jadi Penyumbang Terbesar, PAD Kota Batu Mencapai Rp 123,6 Miliar Artikel ini telah tayang di Surya.co.id dengan judul Sektor Pariwisata Jadi Penyumbang Terbesar, PAD Kota Batu Mencapai Rp 123,6 Miliar, https://surabaya.tribunnews.com/202.
9) Janti, S. (2015). Analisis Validitas dan Reliabilitas Dengan Skala Likert Terhadap Penerapan Strategic Planning Sistem Informasi Garmen: Studi Kasus PT. Asga Indocare. SNIT 2015, 1(1), 67–72.
10) Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision under Risk. Econometrica, 47(2), 263–291. https://doi.org/10.2307/1914185
11) Lisa, O. (2016). Penghindaran Pajak pada Koperasi Syariah di Indonesia. Journal of Research and Applications: Accounting and Management, 2(1), 43–54.
12) Makori, E., Odini, C., & Ojiambo, J. (2013). Use of information communication technologies in education and training of undergraduate library and information science students in two selected Kenyan universities. Library Review, 62. https://doi.org/10.1108/LR-08-2012-0083
13) Mckinsey & Company. (2018). Digital transformations are even more difficult than traditional change efforts to pull off. But the results from the most effective transformations point to five factors for success.
14) Mittone, L. (2006). Dynamic behaviour in tax evasion: An experimental approach. The Journal of Socio-Economics, 35(5), 813–835. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socec.2005.11.065
15) Moleong, L. J. (2004). Metodelogi penelitian. Penerbit Remaja Rosdakarya.
16) Nasucha, C. (2004). Reformasi administrasi publik : teori dan praktik. Grasindo, 2004.
17) Nugroho, R. A., & Zulaikha, Z. (2012). FAKTOR–FAKTOR YANG MEMPENGARUHI KEMAUAN UNTUK MEMBAYAR PAJAK DENGAN KESADARAN MEMBAYAR PAJAK SEBAGAI VARIABEL INTERVENING (Studi Kasus Wajib Pajak Orang Pribadi Yang Melakukan Pekerjaan Bebas Yang Terdaftar Di KPP Pratama Semarang Tengah Satu). Diponegoro Journal of Accounting; Volume 1, Nomor 1, Tahun 2012.
18) Purwanto, A. (2021). Kota Batu: “Swiss Kecil” di Pulau Jawa Tempat Peristirahatan Para Raja.
19) Qoriah, D., & Al Kautsar, M. (2017). Pengaruh Sistem Pengendalian Intern Pemungutan Pajak Hotel Terhadap Efektivitas Penerimaan Pajak Hotel Di Kabupaten Garut Pada Badan Pendapatan Daerah Kabupaten Garut. Jurnal Wacana Ekonomi, Vol. 16(No. 3), 134–139.
20) Seprillina, L., Annisa Qurrata, V., Huang, W.-C., Yusida, E., & Purnamasari, V. (2024). Immediate Economic Effects of Pandemic on Inclusive Growth and Underground Economics: A Case Study Indonesia. KnE Social Sciences, 2024, 639–647. https://doi.org/10.18502/kss.v9i4.15107
21) Sterman, J. (2000). Business Dynamics, System Thinking and Modeling for a Complex World. Http://Lst-Iiep.Iiep-Unesco.Org/Cgi-Bin/Wwwi32.Exe/[In=epidoc1.in]/?T2000=013598/(100), 19.
22) Sugiyono. (2018). Metode Peneiltian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif dan R&D. In Alfabeta Bandung.
23) Susilowati, A., & Mappanyukki, R. (2024). The Impact of Digital Taxation Implementation and Taxpayer Knowledge on Tax Revenue Obstacles, Moderated by Incentive Policy. The Winners, 24(2), 147–157. https://doi.org/10.21512/tw.v24i2.10958
24) Syadat, F. A., & Irwansyah. (2024). Pengaruh Digitalisasi dan Perilaku Wajib Pajak terhadap Kepatuhan Wajib Pajak Orang Pribadi Karyawan PT . BNI ( Persero ) Tbk Divisi Retail Collection & Recovery di Jakarta Tahun 2023 Program Studi Administrasi Publik , Fakultas Ilmu Administrasi Institut. 4(3), 283–292.
25) Widyastuti, R. A. Y. (2021). 2020, Penerimaan Pajak Capai Rp 1.069,98 Triliun atau 89,25 Persen dari Target.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Ahmad Shofiyan, Gunadi Gunadi, Umi Muawanah, Anwar Made (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
