Business Continuity and Organizational Resilience Across the Disaster Management Cycle: A Public-Private Common Operating Picture Framework
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.65150/EP-jefrr/V2E8/2026-07Keywords:
business continuity, organizational resilience, Common Operating Picture, qualitative document analysis, public-private coordination, disaster management, critical service continuity, community lifelines, supply chain resilienceAbstract
Disasters and complex emergencies disrupt not only public safety systems but also the organizations, infrastructure networks, supply chains, utilities, healthcare providers, logistics systems, and service sectors that communities depend on for continuity and recovery. Although business continuity management is often treated as an internal organizational responsibility, major disasters show that continuity cannot be achieved by individual organizations acting alone. This article uses a qualitative document-based conceptual analysis to examine how business continuity and organizational resilience depend on public-private coordination across the disaster management cycle. The analysis synthesizes business continuity and organizational resilience standards, emergency management doctrine, Community Lifelines guidance, situational awareness theory, public-private coordination research, supply chain resilience literature, infrastructure interdependency theory, and emergency information systems research. The findings show that business continuity gaps are often coordination, dependency-visibility, information-sharing, and recovery-tracking problems, not only internal planning failures. The article develops a six-component Public-Private Common Operating Picture framework that integrates risk intelligence and dependency mapping, public-private information sharing, critical service continuity coordination, infrastructure and supply chain visibility, operational recovery tracking, and resilience learning. The article contributes to disaster management and business continuity scholarship by reframing business continuity as a public-private disaster resilience function and by positioning the Common Operating Picture as a human-led decision support mechanism for connecting organizational operations with community lifeline stabilization and operational recovery.
References
1) Bowen, G. A. (2009). Document analysis as a qualitative research method. Qualitative Research Journal, 9(2), 27-40.
https://doi.org/10.3316/QRJ0902027
2) Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77-101.
https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
3) Christopher, M., & Peck, H. (2004). Building the resilient supply chain. The International Journal of Logistics Management, 15(2), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1108/09574090410700275
4) Comfort, L. K. (2007). Crisis management in hindsight: Cognition, communication, coordination, and control. Public Administration Review, 67(s1), 189-197. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2007.00827.x
5) Endsley, M. R. (1995). Toward a theory of situation awareness in dynamic systems. Human Factors, 37(1), 32-64.
https://doi.org/10.1518/001872095779049543
6) Federal Emergency Management Agency. (2017). National Incident Management System (3rd ed.). U.S. Department of Homeland Security. https://www.fema.gov/sites/default/files/2020-07/fema_nims_doctrine-2017.pdf
7) Federal Emergency Management Agency. (2023). Community Lifelines implementation toolkit (Version 2.1). U.S. Department of Homeland Security. https://www.fema.gov/sites/default/files/documents/fema_lifelines-toolkit-v2.1_2023.pdf
8) International Organization for Standardization. (2017). ISO 22316:2017: Security and resilience - Organizational resilience - Principles and attributes. https://www.iso.org/standard/50053.html
9) International Organization for Standardization. (2019). ISO 22301:2019: Security and resilience - Business continuity management systems - Requirements. https://www.iso.org/standard/75106.html
10) Kapucu, N. (2006). Interagency communication networks during emergencies: Boundary spanners in multiagency coordination. The American Review of Public Administration, 36(2), 207-225. https://doi.org/10.1177/0275074005280605
11) Rinaldi, S. M., Peerenboom, J. P., & Kelly, T. K. (2001). Identifying, understanding, and analyzing critical infrastructure interdependencies. IEEE Control Systems Magazine, 21(6), 11-25. https://doi.org/10.1109/37.969131
12) Sheffi, Y., & Rice, J. B., Jr. (2005). A supply chain view of the resilient enterprise. MIT Sloan Management Review, 47(1), 41-48.
13) Steen-Tveit, K., & Munkvold, B. E. (2021). From common operational picture to common situational understanding: An analysis based on practitioner perspectives. Safety Science, 142, Article 105381. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2021.105381
14) Tierney, K. J. (2007). From the margins to the mainstream? Disaster research at the crossroads. Annual Review of Sociology, 33, 503-525. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.33.040406.131743
15) Turoff, M., Chumer, M., Van de Walle, B. A., & Yao, X. (2004). The design of a dynamic emergency response management information system. Journal of Information Technology Theory and Application, 5(4),1-36. https://aisel.aisnet.org/jitta/vol5/iss4/3/
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 SK Monirul Islam Mahadi (Author)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.









